MEASUREMENT SCIENCE REVIEW 


REVIEWER'S RECOMMENDATION FORM


MSR-Number:


Author(s):


Title:


Dear Reviewer, MEASUREMENT SCIENCE REVIEW has won its position as a high quality international journal. With your help as a referee we will be pleased to confirm and to increase this quality. We are now asking our referees to judge a paper by rigorously implementing the following criteria:
 
QUALITY:

The paper has the highest scientific quality
Good quality of the paper, original, internationally competitive
Good quality of the paper, recommended as a technical note or a short communication
Medium quality, limited interest
Low quality, poor work, unsuitable for publishing


QUESTIONS:

Does the article have a character of a basic scientific research paper in the “Measurement Science” sphere, (theory, analysis, synthesis, modelling, measurement, new sensors, data processing, data interpretation, graphical evaluation, new results,..)?
Yes
Partially
No


Does the article explain a clear description of what is new, how these results advance the scientific and technological elements of the subject "Measurement Science" ?
New information
Valuable confirmation of present knowledge
Clarity to present understanding
New perspective, issue, or problem definition
Not much


Do you think this manuscript is of potential interest?
Great interest to most readers
Interest to most readers
Interest to a few readers, scientists in the specific field
Little interest to any reader


RECOMMENDATION:    
     
I. TO BE ACCEPTED a) for publication in present form
  b) with minor amendments
     
II. TO BE REVISED a) some points need to be clarified
  b) contains some errors
  c) the title is not adequate and appropriate
  d) diagrams, tables, and captions are not clear
  e) badly written (poor English)
  f) references old and inadequate
  g) too many figures / tables
  h) figures poorly drawn
  i) abstract and conclusion not general enough to be understood by the non-specialists
     
III. TO BE REJECTED    a) contains basic errors or faulty judgements
  b) not original and important enough
  c) the subject is too far removed from Measurement Science
  d) more suitable for other journal
     
If you wish, you can use this space for your REPORT to the author(s):

or submit your REPORT on separate file:


Report for editor only:


REVIEWER'S PERSONAL DATA
NAME:
ADDRESS:
E-MAIL:


 Please, write this security code into the text field bellow:
token